advertisement

Governor amends property tax legislation

<p class="BODY" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Imperial">Gov. Rod Blagojevich on Thursday rewrote portions of a proposed law that deals mainly with Cook County property assessments but also would set up a statewide method of assessing wind farms for property tax purposes.</font>

<p class="BODY" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">

<p class="BODY" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Imperial">Blagojevich used his amendatory veto power to recommend revisions to the Cook County part of House Bill 664. At a public appearance in Chicago, he said the legislation in its present form does not provide enough relief for the county's homeowners.</font>

<p class="BODY" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">

<p class="BODY" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Imperial">In a news release, the governor said that "we can do better and with the changes I'm making ... over 75 percent of Cook County homeowners will see significant property tax relief."</font>

<p class="BODY" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">

<p class="BODY" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Imperial">Even though the governor did not alter the provisions concerning wind farms, the fate of those provisions is entwined with the rest of the overall bill.</font>

<p class="BODY" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">

<p class="BODY" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Imperial">Lawmakers will have to decide next month whether to accept Blagojevich's revisions to House Bill 664, which would require a majority vote in the House and the Senate. If they opt instead to override the governor's veto, that would require a three-fifths vote in each chamber.</font>

<p class="BODY" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">

<p class="BODY" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Imperial">If neither of those scenarios plays out, then the legislation would die and nothing would happen.</font>

<p class="BODY" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">

<p class="BODY" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Imperial">Rep. Frank Mautino, a Spring Valley Democrat who has led the charge on the wind farm issue, said he thinks lawmakers will either accept the amendatory veto or override it.</font>

<p class="BODY" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">

<p class="BODY" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Imperial">If the legislation simply dies, lawmakers would face the unpleasant prospect of having their Cook County constituents receive higher property tax bills with a first payment due around Christmas, Mautino said.</font>

<p class="BODY" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">

<p class="BODY" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Imperial">The wind farm provisions in HB664 are meant to solve an existing problem: the inconsistency among Illinois counties about how to assess them. Different methodologies complicate property assessments for wind farms that cross county lines.</font>

<p class="BODY" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">

<p class="BODY" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Imperial">Under the legislation, a wind farm installed in 2007 would pay a tax of $9,000 per megawatt. That figure would drop slightly each year because of physical depreciation of the wind devices. </font>

<p class="BODY" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">

<p class="BODY" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Imperial">If enacted into law, the measure would expire - or "sunset" - after the 2011 tax year. The sunset date is meant to let lawmakers review how well the law is working.</font>

<p class="BODY" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Imperial"> </font>

<p class="BODY" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Imperial">Adriana Colindres can be reached at (217) 782-6292 or adriana.colindres@sj-r.com.</font>